๐ŸŽฑ

8์žฅ Optimal Tests of Hypotheses (2)

Uniformly Most Power Test (UMP Test)

์ด์ „์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ์ €ํฌ๋Š” H0H_0 ๊ณผ H1H_1 ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ์— H0:ฮผ=ฮผ0H1:ฮผโ‰ ฮผ0ย ํ˜น์€ฮผ>ฮผ0H_0: \mu = \mu_0 \quad H_1 : \mu \ne \mu_0 \text{ ํ˜น์€} \mu > \mu_0 ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋น„๊ต๋ฅผ ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ Composite Hypothesis ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถ€๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ S

์ฆ‰ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€์ง€์˜ Simple Hypothesis ๋“ค์ด ๋ชจ์—ฌ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐํ•˜๋ฉด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ์ด์œ ๋Š” 1์ข… ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ 2์ข… ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ํŒ๋‹จํ–ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ ํ•ด์„œ ์ €ํฌ์˜ ๊ฐ€์„ค๊ฒ€์ •์„ ์ฑ„ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์„ ์ €ํฌ๋Š” Critical Region ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถˆ๋ €์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์˜ˆ์‹œ๋กœ ์ •์˜๊ฐ€ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Rejectย H0ย ifย Xห‰โ‰ฅ5,Criticalย Region=C={(X1,X2):Xห‰โ‰ฅ5}={(X1,X2):X1+X22โ‰ฅ5}={(X1,X2):X1+X2โ‰ฅ10}\text{Reject } H_0 \text{ if } \bar X \ge 5, \\ \text{Critical Region} = C = \{(X_1, X_2) : \bar{X} \ge 5 \} = \{(X_1, X_2) : \frac{X_1 + X_2}{2} \ge 5 \} = \{(X_1, X_2) : X_1 + X_2 \ge 10 \}

Best Critical Region ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ด๊ฒƒ์˜ ๊ฒ€์ •๋ ฅ (Power) ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™” ์‹œ์ผœ์ฃผ๋Š” Region ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋งํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ฐ€์„ค๊ฒ€์ •์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ MP-Test, ์ฆ‰ Most Powerful-Test ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถ€๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ ‡๋‹ค๋ฉด UMP-Test ๋Š” ๋ฌด์—‡์ผ๊นŒ์š”? UMP-Test ๋ž€ ๋Œ€๋ฆฝ๊ฐ€์„ค ๋“ค ์ค‘์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋Œ€๋ฆฝ๊ฐ€์„ค๋“ค์„ ์‹น๋‹ค ๋ชจ์•„์„œ ๊ฒ€์ •ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ๋„ ์ด 2์ข… ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๊ฐ€ ์ตœ์†Œํ™” ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒ€์ •์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์œ„์—์„œ H1H_1 ์ด ํ˜„์žฌ ๋ฒ”์œ„๋กœ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ์ด ๋ฒ”์œ„ ๋‚ด์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฐ’๋“ค์ด ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ์—๋Š” ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ •๋“ค์ด ๋ ํ…๋ฐ, ์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ฒ€์ • ์ค‘์—์„œ 2์ข… ์˜ค๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”, ์ฆ‰ ๊ฒ€์ •๋ ฅ์ด ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™” ๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ •์˜๋Š” ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

CC ๋Š” ฮฑ\alpha ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ Critical Region ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ด๊ฒƒ์ด UMP Critical Region ์ด ๋˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” CC ๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๋ฆฝ๊ฐ€์„ค ๋‚ด์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  Simple Hypothesis ์—์„œ Best Critical Region ์ด์–ด์•ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ Critical Region ์— ๊ฒ€์ •์„ ์น˜๋ฃจ๊ฒŒ ๋œ๋‹ค๋ฉด ๊ทธ๊ฒƒ์„ Uniformly Most Power (UMP) Test ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถ€๋ฅด๊ฒŒ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

UMP Test ๋Š” ํ•ญ์ƒ ์กด์žฌํ•˜์ง€๋Š” ์•Š์ง€๋งŒ Neyman-Pearson Theorem ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ UMP Test ๋ฅผ ์ฐพ๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์กด์žฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Example 8.2.2

X1,โ‹ฏโ€‰,XnโˆผiidNโก(0,ฮธ),ฮธ>0X_1, \cdots, X_n \stackrel{iid}{\sim} \operatorname N(0, \theta), \quad \theta > 0

๊ท€๋ฌด๊ฐ€์„ค H0:ฮธ=ฮธโ€ฒH_0 : \theta = \theta^\prime

๋Œ€๋ฆฝ๊ฐ€์„ค H1:ฮธ>ฮธโ€ฒH_1 : \theta > \theta^\prime

ฮฉ={ฮธ:ฮธโ‰ฅฮธโ€ฒ}\Omega = \{\theta : \theta \ge \theta^\prime \}

UMP Test ๋ฅผ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ตฌํ• ๊นŒ์š”?

  1. ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ MP Test ๋ฅผ ๋จผ์ € ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค H0:ฮธ=ฮธโ€ฒv.s.H1:ฮธ=ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒH_0 : \theta = \theta^\prime \quad v.s. \quad H_1: \theta = \theta^{\prime\prime}, ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒ>ฮธโ€ฒ\theta^{\prime\prime} > \theta^\prime
  1. 1๋ฒˆ์—์„œ์˜ MP Test ๊ฐ€ ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒ\theta^{\prime\prime} ์— ์˜์กดํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ๋ผ!

์šฐ์„ ์€ 1๋ฒˆ, ์ฆ‰ ๊ท€๋ฌด๊ฐ€์„ค์ด H0:ฮธ=ฮธโ€ฒvsH1:ฮธ=ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒH_0: \theta = \theta^\prime \quad vs \quad H_1 : \theta = \theta^{\prime\prime} ์œผ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•ด๋ณด๊ฒ ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๊ทธ์ € Neyman-Pearson Theorem ๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉ์‹œ์ผœ๋ณด๊ฒ ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฆ‰ ์šฐ๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋จผ์ € ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•ด์•ผ๊ฒ ์ฃ .

L(ฮธ;x1,x2,โ‹ฏโ€‰,xn)=(12ฯ€ฮธ)n/2expโก{โˆ’12ฮธโˆ‘i=1nxi2}L(\theta; x_1, x_2, \cdots, x_n) = \left(\frac{1}{2\pi\theta} \right)^{n/2} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2\theta} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\right\}

๊ทธ ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” L(ฮธโ€ฒ;x1,โ‹ฏโ€‰,xn)L(ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒ;x1,โ‹ฏโ€‰,xn)\frac{L(\theta^\prime; x_1,\cdots, x_n)}{L(\theta^{\prime\prime}; x_1, \cdots, x_n)} ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๊ฒŒ ์–ด๋–ค ์–‘์˜ ์ƒ์ˆ˜ kk ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ดํ•˜๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ฒ ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๊ฒƒ์„ ์ •๋ฆฌํ•˜๋ฉด, ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋‚˜์˜ค๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

โˆ‘i=1nxi2โ‰ฅ2ฮธโ€ฒฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒโˆ’ฮธโ€ฒ[n2logโก(ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒฮธโ€ฒ)โˆ’logโกk]=c\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 \ge \frac{2\theta^\prime \theta^{\prime\prime}}{\theta^{\prime\prime} - \theta^\prime} \left[\frac{n}{2} \log\left(\frac{\theta^{\prime\prime}}{\theta^\prime} \right) - \log k\right] = c

์ด๋Ÿฌ๋ฉด, ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์˜์—ญ์ด ์ €ํฌ์˜ Best Critical Region ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋งํ•  ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

โˆ‘i=1nxi2โ‰ฅc\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 \ge c

๋‹น์—ฐํžˆ ์ด๋Ÿฌ๋ฉด cc ๊ฐ’์ด ๋ญ”์ง€ ๋ชฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ฐพ์•„์•ผ๊ฒ ์ฃ , ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ €ํฌ๋Š” ์ขŒ์ธก ๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ๊ทนํ•œ๋ถ„ํฌ๋กœ ๋ฐ”๊ฟ”์ค„ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

โˆ‘i=1nXi2ฮธโ€ฒโˆผฯ‡2(n)\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2}{\theta^\prime} \sim \chi^2(n)

์œ„์˜ ๊ทนํ•œ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— Best Critical Region ์„ ๊ฐ–๊ณ ์˜ค๋ฉด,

ฮฑ=Pโกฮธโ€ฒ(โˆ‘i=1nXi2โ‰ฅc)=Pโกฮธโ€ฒ(โˆ‘i=1nXi2ฮธโ€ฒโ‰ฅcฮธโ€ฒ)\alpha = \operatorname P_{\theta^\prime}\left(\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2 \ge c\right) = \operatorname P_{\theta^\prime}\left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2}{\theta^\prime} \ge \frac{c}{\theta^\prime}\right)

์ด๊ฒƒ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ c/ฮธโ€ฒc/\theta^\prime ์˜ ๊ฐ’๋„ ๊ตฌํ•  ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, cc ์˜ ๊ฐ’๋„ ๊ตฌํ•  ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ตญ์—๋Š” 1๋ฒˆ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์„ ๋งˆ๋ฌด๋ฆฌ ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

2๋ฒˆ์—์„œ๋Š” 1๋ฒˆ์˜ Test ๊ฐ€ ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒ\theta^{\prime\prime} ์— ์˜์กดํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋ฉด UMP-Test ๊ฐ€ ๋งŒ์กฑ์ด ๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ˜„์žฌ๋กœ์„œ๋Š” ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒ\theta^{\prime\prime} ์— ์ „ํ˜€ ์˜์กด์„ ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ์Šต์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ ‡๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํ•ด๋‹น Test, ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ Critical Region ์€ UMP Critical Region, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ UMP-Test ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค!

C={xโ€ฒ:โˆ‘i=1nXi2ฮธโ€ฒโ‰ฅฯ‡ฮฑ2(n)}C = \left\{\bold{x^\prime} : \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i^2}{\theta^\prime} \ge \chi^2_\alpha(n)\right\}
Monotone Likelihood Ratio

๋งŒ์•ฝ์— ์šฐ๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜ L(ฮธ,x)L(\theta, \bold x) ๊ฐ€ ฮธ1<ฮธ2\theta_1 < \theta_2 ์ผ ๋•Œ์—

L(ฮธ1,x)L(ฮธ2,x)\frac{L(\theta_1, \bold x)}{L(\theta_2, \bold x)}

๊ฐ€ y=u(x)y = u(\bold x) ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ Monotone Function ์ด๋ฉด, ์šฐ๋„ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ Monotone Likelihood Ratio (MLR) ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถ€๋ฆ…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งŒ์•ฝ์— ฮธ1<ฮธ2\theta_1 < \theta_2 ์ด๋ฉฐ L(ฮธ1;x)L(ฮธ2;x)\frac{L(\theta_1; \bold x)}{L(\theta_2 ; \bold x)} ๊ฐ€ y=u(x)y = u(\bold x) ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ Decreasing Function ์ผ ๋•Œ์—, ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ Test ๋Š”H0:ฮธโ‰คฮธโ€ฒH1:ฮธ>ฮธโ€ฒH_0 : \theta \le \theta^\prime \quad H_1 : \theta > \theta^\prime ์˜ ๊ฐ€์„ค ์•„๋ž˜์—์„œ ฮฑ\alpha ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ UMP Test ์ด๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Rejectย H0ย ifย Yโ‰ฅcY\text{Reject } H_0 \text{ if } Y\ge c_Y

cYc_Y ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ฮฑ=Pฮธโ€ฒ(Yโ‰ฅcY)\alpha = P_{\theta^\prime}(Y \ge c_Y) ์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Example 8.2.2 ์—์„œ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€ ๊ฒƒ๊ณผ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์€ ๊ต‰์žฅํžˆ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๋ชจ์Šต์ด์ฃ .

Neyman-Pearson Theorem ์— ์˜ํ•˜๋ฉด CC, Critical Region ์€

L(ฮธโ€ฒ,X)L(ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒ,X)โ‰คk\frac{L(\theta^\prime, \bold X)}{L(\theta^{\prime\prime}, \bold X)} \le k

์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด ๋˜๋ฉฐ, kk ๋Š” ฮฑ=Pฮธโ€ฒ[XโˆˆC]\alpha = P_{\theta^\prime}[\bold X \in C] ์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒ>ฮธโ€ฒ\theta^{\prime\prime} > \theta^\prime ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—,

L(ฮธโ€ฒ,X)L(ฮธโ€ฒโ€ฒ,X)=g(Y)โ‰คkโ†”Yโ‰ฅgโˆ’1(k)\frac{L(\theta^\prime, \bold X)}{L(\theta^{\prime\prime}, \bold X)} = g(Y) \le k \leftrightarrow Y \ge g^{-1}(k)

์œผ๋กœ ๋งˆ๋ฌด๋ฆฌ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฌ๊ธฐ์—์„œ gg ๋ผ๋Š” ํ•จ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ Monotone Increasing ์ธ์ง€ Monotone Decreasing ์ธ์ง€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ Inequality ์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ์ •ํ•ด์ง‘๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋งŒ์•ฝ์— gg ๊ฐ€ Monotone Increasing ํ•˜๋‹ค๋ฉด,

g(Y)โ‰คkโ†”Yโ‰คgโˆ’1(k)g(Y) \le k \leftrightarrow Y \le g^{-1}(k)

๋ฐ˜๋ฉด์— gg ๊ฐ€ Monotone Decreasing ํ•˜๋‹ค๋ฉด,

g(Y)โ‰คkโ†”Yโ‰ฅgโˆ’1(k)g(Y) \le k \leftrightarrow Y \ge g^{-1}(k)

ฯ‡ฮฑ2(n)\chi^2_\alpha(n)